SLPSystematic ReviewDevelopmental medicine and child neurology2020

Factors associated with spoken language comprehension in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review.

Emma Vaillant, Johanna J M Geytenbeek, Elise P Jansma and 3 others

PMID 32852786

WHAT IT FOUND

In children with cerebral palsy, poorer spoken language comprehension was seen with lower intellectual functioning, more severe white matter damage, and more limited mobility.

Caregiver speech and AAC systems were barely studied.

Key findings

01Poorer spoken language comprehension was linked to lower intellectual functioning and more severe periventricular leukomalacia.

02Functional mobility was reported as associated with spoken language comprehension in twelve studies, although three studies did not show this association.

03Caregiver speech, language activities, and AAC systems were not reported in the included studies.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The review reports associations, not effects of therapy, so it cannot show that changing a factor improves comprehension. Some studies measured children at one time point or looked back at records, which is weaker for understanding causes. The studies used different ways to classify motor type, mobility, hand function and speech, so results are hard to compare. Some studies included only narrow subgroups, such as children with unilateral CP or GMFCS levels IV and V. No included study reported a power analysis. Only English articles were included. Important factors such as caregiver speech, language activities, and AAC use were not studied, so gaps remain.

Declared interests

The review was funded by JKF Kinderfonds and Stichting Rotterdams Kinderrevalidatie Fonds Adriaanstichting. Some included studies did not report funding or conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read these associations as evidence that changing mobility, speech, or AAC systems will improve comprehension. The review included observational studies of factors, not trials of interventions.

Read it on PubMed →