Factors associated with ABCDE bundle adherence in critically ill adults requiring mechanical ventilation: An observational design.
Jacqueline M DeMellow, Tae Youn Kim, Patrick S Romano and 2 others
PMID 32414557WHAT IT FOUND
ICU teams documented a mean 66% of recommended ABCDE bundle care in ventilated patients, with delirium and mobility lowest.
Adherence was lower with longer ventilation and continuous sedation, and lower for Hispanic patients.
Key findings
01In the first 96 hours, overall ABCDE bundle adherence averaged 66 ± 14% (range 25 to 100%).
02Mean adherence was higher for pain and sedation (93 ± 16%), awakening trials (81 ± 35%) and breathing trials (73 ± 36%) than for delirium (44 ± 35%) and mobility (44 ± 35%).
03Adherence was higher with mechanical ventilation under 48 hours and no or continuous sedation under 24 hours, and lower for Hispanic patients.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study was observational, so it cannot show that sedation duration, ventilation duration, ethnicity, hospital site or any other factor caused lower adherence. It measured electronic documentation, not the full care clinicians delivered. If an assessment or intervention was not documented, it was counted as not delivered, which may underestimate adherence. Only the first 96 hours of mechanical ventilation were examined, so it does not describe bundle adherence over the whole ICU stay. The family engagement element was not measured. For pain, sedation, delirium and mobility, the study measured assessments rather than the interventions themselves. Analgesic infusions were not counted as sedation, and intermittent sedation was not studied. Patients with chronic ventilator or tracheostomy care, comfort care orders or coma were excluded, so the results do not describe those groups. APACHE III scores captured illness at ICU admission but not changes during the ICU stay. The hospitals varied in performance monitoring and feedback, so results may not apply to every ICU.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read these associations as proof that reducing sedation or ventilation time will improve care, or that higher adherence will improve patient outcomes. The study observed documentation over the first 96 hours, did not measure family engagement, and treated missing documentation as non-adherence.