SLPOtherTrends in hearing2024

Externalization of Speech When Listening With Hearing Aids.

Virginia Best, Elin Roverud

PMID 38347733

WHAT IT FOUND

Hearing aids made words seem closer to or inside the head than unaided listening, especially with closed domes and behind-the-ear microphones.

This was a small laboratory study in young adults, not evidence of everyday benefit or harm.

Key findings

01Compared with unaided listening, aided listening produced lower externalization ratings and more internalized responses.

02Closed domes produced lower externalization ratings than open domes, and behind-the-ear microphones produced lower ratings than in-the-ear microphones.

03In the front-back configuration, behind-the-ear closed domes produced 33% reversals in both groups, while unaided reversals were 2% for normal-hearing listeners and 20% for hearing-impaired listeners.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study included only young adults, so it does not show what happens in older adults who commonly use hearing aids. Participants were tested immediately after fitting, so the results describe acute effects rather than effects after weeks or months of use. The room was a sound booth with little reverberation, so distance judgments were driven partly by loudness rather than real-world spatial cues. Head movement was not controlled or recorded, so natural head motion in daily life could change the effects. Only 6 of the 10 hearing-impaired listeners completed the own-aids condition, and their devices and settings differed, so own-device results are limited. Hearing-impaired listeners did not complete the in-the-ear open condition because the manufacturer did not recommend it for greater than mild losses. For in-the-ear conditions, devices could mix in-the-ear and behind-the-ear microphone inputs depending on calibration and gain, so the two microphone positions were not fully independent. Ear-canal recordings were made in a manikin, not in each listener, so individual acoustic differences were not measured.

Declared interests

The paper states that the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders funded the work.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that hearing aids should be avoided or that these laboratory effects are the same in daily life. The study tested acute judgments in young adults, not long-term users in real environments.

Read it on PubMed →