PTPilotDisability and rehabilitation2017

Exploring the impact of visual and movement based priming on a motor intervention in the acute phase post-stroke in persons with severe hemiparesis of the upper extremity.

Jigna Patel, Qinyin Qiu, Mathew Yarossi and 5 others

PMID 27636200

WHAT IT FOUND

Five people with flaccid hands after acute stroke tolerated a 45-minute virtual mirror and movement priming plus pinch training session.

Four showed improved pinch-force tracking, but without a control group these gains cannot be attributed to the intervention.

Key findings

01Five participants received seven or eight 45-minute sessions, and all training was well tolerated without adverse side effects.

02Four of five participants improved on the pinch-force tracking task over sessions, while one could not perform it adequately.

03The pinch trace task allowed active participation despite no observable voluntary movement of the affected hand.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

No control group or usual-care comparison was included, so spontaneous recovery, usual rehabilitation, and task familiarity could explain the changes. Only five participants were studied, and they were selected from 80 screened people, so the sample is small and highly selected. Participants were within one month of stroke and had severe paresis but no severe spasticity, neglect, proprioceptive loss, unstable vital signs, or inability to follow commands, so results may not apply to more medically or cognitively complex patients. Clinical gains during training were mostly proximal, and one participant could not perform the pinch trace task adequately. The authors acknowledge that improved pinch trace performance could reflect becoming familiar with a new task rather than motor learning. TMS was performed for only four subjects. No brain-stimulation responses were observed from the lesioned hemisphere, so interpretation of cortical changes is limited. The paper describes planned eight one-hour sessions but also reports seven or eight 45-minute sessions, so the actual dose is unclear.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that this priming and pinch training caused recovery. The study had no control group, only five participants, and early spontaneous recovery plus usual inpatient rehabilitation could account for the gains.

Read it on PubMed →