PTCase-ControlJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2026

Exploring brain activity differences in functional constipation using fNIRS: a case-control study.

Weishuyi Ruan, Fangchao Wu, Zhiping Liao and 9 others

PMID 42363274

WHAT IT FOUND

Brain activity did not differ significantly between functional constipation patients and healthy controls during three defecation-related tasks.

Group-averaged trends showed lower motor and sensory activation during defecation tasks and higher activation during sphincter contraction in patients.

Key findings

01After correction, resting brain activity and resting functional connectivity did not differ between patients with functional constipation and healthy controls.

02After correction, cortical activation during imagined defecation, simulated defecation, and anal sphincter contraction did not differ between the groups.

03The reported patient differences were numerical trends only: lower right motor cortex during imagined defecation, lower bilateral motor and right sensory cortex during simulated defecation, and higher left motor, supplementary motor/premotor and sensory cortex during sphincter contraction.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The constipation group was older than the control group, so age may have influenced the brain measures. Five patients and two controls were excluded for motion artifact or poor data acquisition. fNIRS measured cortical hemodynamics and could not assess deeper brain structures. The study did not verify pelvic floor muscle effort with surface electromyography or anorectal manometry. No between-group differences reached significance after correction, and the authors say variability may have limited power. The study did not collect quantitative clinical severity scores. The study did not separate slow-transit constipation from outlet obstruction subtypes. The study did not test a treatment or measure bowel symptoms.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the numerical brain activation trends as proof of a constipation mechanism or as evidence that pelvic floor muscle training works. The between-group differences were not significant, and no bowel symptom outcomes were measured.

Read it on PubMed →