Experiences who are d/Deaf and queer individuals: a systematic review and meta-synthesis.
Kiara Murphy, Sophie C Dahlenburg
PMID 41259224WHAT IT FOUND
d/Deaf queer people described double exclusion from hearing and Deaf worlds, plus pride from sign language and Deaf queer community.
Many masked an identity to survive. These are lived experiences, not evidence that any treatment works.
Key findings
01Participants in 13 studies reported homophobic or audist targeting within each community.
02Participants in ten studies described connection through sign language as uniting them and building confidence in Deaf identity.
03Participants in 14 studies reported masking one or both identities as the most salient coping strategy.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The evidence is qualitative and small in each study, so it describes lived experience rather than measuring treatment effects. The review combined all queer labels, and only two studies included transgender or non-binary participants, so trans and non-binary experiences are thin. Most studies were from the United States, with no Australian studies, one African study, and two Asian studies, so geography may limit transferability. Many included studies were dissertations or book chapters, and some older studies were less transparent about methods. Quality appraisal found a lack of reflexivity statements in several studies. Both review authors were hearing, and the first author notes that hearing status may moderate depth of analysis. The sample mostly had hearing parents, so experiences of d/Deaf queer people with Deaf families are not well represented.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read the review as evidence that a specific therapy helps or harms d/Deaf queer people. It reports participants' experiences, including some accounts of speech pathologists and oralist schooling, but it did not test an intervention or outcome.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →