Experiences of Participants in a Self-Management Program for Employees with Complaints of the Arm, Neck or Shoulder (CANS): A Mixed Methods Study.
Nathan Hutting, Sarah I Detaille, Yvonne F Heerkens and 3 others
PMID 26875155WHAT IT FOUND
Employees with arm, neck or shoulder complaints described a self-management program as helpful mainly for awareness, coping and action plans.
Some wanted more physical guidance; eHealth use varied. This is experience, not proof it works.
Key findings
01Participants described increased awareness and acceptance of their complaints as key perceived benefits.
02About 75% of participants agreed they would recommend the program, but some wanted more physical focus.
03The eHealth module was liked by some users, especially exercises, but many did not use it extensively.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Interviews happened only after the sessions, so participants' expectations may have been shaped by what they experienced. The interview guide and thematic analysis may have directed what was reported. Most participants worked in hospital or educational settings and had relatively high education, so experiences may not match other workplaces. Interviews were shortly after the last session, so long-term behavior change was not known. Only participants' perspectives were collected, not supervisors, colleagues, or moderators. The eHealth module was not used extensively by many participants, limiting conclusions about its value. Satisfaction and perceived benefit cannot show whether the program improves clinical outcomes; the linked randomized trial found no significant difference on most outcome measures. Some positive responses may reflect a wish to give favorable answers, although participants also gave criticism.
Declared interests
The study was funded by the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development. No other funding or conflict-of-interest declaration is given in the supplied text.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read the high satisfaction scores or perceived reduction in complaints as proof that the program works. This paper reports participants' experiences, and the authors note that most outcome measures in the linked randomized trial showed no significant difference.