RNSurveyJournal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society2019

Examining Prevalence and Risk Factors of Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis Using the International Pressure Ulcer Prevalence Survey.

Susan A Kayser, LeeAnn Phipps, Catherine A VanGilder and 1 others

PMID 31276451

WHAT IT FOUND

Among 13,615 incontinent patients, 18% had incontinence-associated dermatitis.

Fecal incontinence and fecal management systems had the highest rates. Bed mobility, weight, longer stay, and linen layers were associated with risk.

Key findings

01The final sample included 56,209 adults, including 13,615 incontinent patients, and IAD was documented in 4.3% overall and 18% among incontinent patients.

02IAD prevalence was highest in long-term acute care (9.1%) among all patients and highest among fecal management systems (26%) versus urine-only incontinence (12%).

03Compared with urine-only incontinence, fecal incontinence and fecal management systems had higher odds (OR 1.55 to 1.65), and bed mobility (OR 1.22), 20 kg weight (OR 1.07), 5 days stay (OR 1.11), and linen layer (OR 1.08) had higher odds; age was not significant.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

IAD identification depended on survey coordinators and was not monitored for accuracy, so some cases may have been missed or misclassified. The survey could not distinguish IAD present on admission from facility-acquired IAD. The design cannot show that fecal management systems, linen layers, weight, stay, or mobility caused IAD. The regression model fit poorly, so important risk factors were missing. Facilities choosing the survey may have been more attentive to skin breakdown, which could affect prevalence estimates.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that reducing linen layers or changing fecal management systems prevents IAD. This survey found associations, not tested interventions, and IAD identification was not monitored for accuracy.

Read it on PubMed →


The study

Participants
56,209 adults; 13,615 incontinent patients
Certainty of evidence
Low

Related papers

Browse

Cite

Susan A Kayser, LeeAnn Phipps, Catherine A VanGilder, et al. Examining Prevalence and Risk Factors of Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis Using the International Pressure Ulcer Prevalence Survey. Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society. 2019.

Read the original