RNNarrative ReviewRehabilitation nursing : the official journal of the Association of Rehabilitation Nurses

Evidence-Based Care of Children With Tracheostomies: Hospitalization to Home Care.

Patricia R Lawrence, Rebecca Chambers, Melissa Spezia Faulkner and 1 others

PMID 32108728

WHAT IT FOUND

Children with tracheostomies need tailored suctioning, tube replacement, tie checks, and stoma care.

Family teaching and standardized care are recommended for safe transition home, but many practices rest on expert consensus.

Key findings

01Suctioning should be tailored to the child, done only when secretions are audible or visible or obstruction is suspected, and catheters should be premeasured with suction applied for no more than 5 seconds during insertion and removal.

02Tracheostomy ties should be checked regularly and kept loose enough for one finger; a retrospective study of 109 patients supported Velcro ties over cotton twill ties, with less skin irritation and no accidental decannulation events reported, though the skin breakdown difference was not statistically significant.

03Stoma care should use saline and prepackaged split gauze; hydrogen peroxide and cut gauze are discouraged because they can irritate skin or release fibers.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

This is a narrative review with no described search, appraisal, or original results, so it summarizes recommendations rather than testing them. The review says empirical research is limited and many pediatric tracheostomy practices rely on expert consensus or outdated guidelines. Some cited evidence comes from small studies or adult settings, so it may not apply to all children with tracheostomies. The article does not provide a home-care protocol or caregiver competency checklist, only notes that such checklists are being developed.

Declared interests

The authors declare there are no conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read these recommendations as tested protocols. The review states that empirical research is limited and that many practices, including tube change frequency and stoma care schedules, rely on expert consensus.

Read it on PubMed →