SLPOtherEar and hearing2022

Evaluation of the Benefits of Bilateral Fitting in Bone-Anchored Hearing System Users: Spatial Resolution and Memory for Speech.

William Brassington, Rosalyn Parker, Federica Bianchi

PMID 36378104

WHAT IT FOUND

Memory for speech did not improve overall with two bone-anchored hearing processors versus one.

Spatial localization improved greatly, from a median 75.04° to 3.61°, in adults already bilaterally implanted.

Key findings

01The median localization angle was 75.04° in the unilateral condition and 3.61° in the bilateral condition.

02Mean total recall was 55.03% in the unilateral condition and 57.23% in the bilateral condition, and the overall difference was not statistically significant.

03Self-reported spatial performance averaged 3.7, and it did not line up with the bilateral localization score.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The listeners were already bilaterally implanted and used two processors daily, so the unilateral condition was an acute change and may not reflect people who use one BAHS all the time. The study included 24 listeners, and subgroup findings were based on small or unbalanced groups, including four listeners above 65 years and seven simultaneously implanted listeners. Blinding was imperfect because the experimenter changed processors between conditions, and one processor was muted in the unilateral condition. The SSQ12 scores described everyday performance with the participants' own processors, not with the test processors used in the laboratory. The localization test measured right-left discrimination, not multi-source localization, so a small laboratory angle does not necessarily mean accurate everyday localization. Gain was prescribed with a standard method without individual control for interaural symmetry. The paper does not state a single primary outcome, and the memory result was null while secondary list and subgroup effects were reported.

Declared interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The article is listed as supported by non-U.S. government.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the subgroup and single-list memory results as evidence that bilateral BAHS fitting improves memory for speech. The overall condition effect was not significant, and the authors say more investigation is needed.

Read it on PubMed →