Establishing Concurrent Validity of the Role Checklist Version 2 with the OCAIRS in Measurement of Participation: A Pilot Study.
Patricia J Scott, Danielle Cacich, Morgan Fulk and 2 others
PMID 29097976WHAT IT FOUND
The shorter Role Checklist Version 2 and the longer OCAIRS V4 scores moved together in 20 liver transplant recipients.
OTs may have a quicker way to check role participation.
Key findings
01In 20 liver transplant recipients, RCV2: QP and OCAIRS V4 composite scores were positively related (r(18)=.63, p<.01).
02RCV2: QP scores ranged from -1.2 to 3.0 with a mean of 0.56 and SD of 1.34, and OCAIRS V4 scores ranged from 2.08 to 4.0 with a mean of 3.43 and SD of 0.57.
03Days since transplant did not significantly correlate with RCV2: QP (r(18)=-.21, p=.39) or OCAIRS V4 (r(18)=-.13, p=.59).
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Only 20 participants completed the study. All participants were liver transplant recipients within 12 months after transplant. The sample included 4 females and 16 males. Small sample and specific population limit generalizability. The OCAIRS V4 had some fair interrater reliability values, including r=0.32 for system trajectory and r=0.40 for feedback.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude the RCV2: QP can replace the OCAIRS V4 for all patients. It was tested only in 20 liver transplant recipients within 12 months after transplant.