SLPPilotFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2022

Enhancing Person-Centered Audiologic Rehabilitation: Exploring the Use of an Interview Tool Based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Core Sets for Hearing Loss.

Sarah Granberg, Åsa Skagerstrand

PMID 36188968

WHAT IT FOUND

An ICF-based interview did not change existing hearing-aid and communication plans.

Audiologists reported deeper patient information, positive patient responses to an interview figure, and barriers of time, referrals, emotional discussions, and training.

Key findings

01Audiologists reported that the interview elicited deeper information that might not have surfaced otherwise.

02The additional information did not lead to rehabilitation beyond hearing aids and communication-related interventions.

03Audiologists reported time demands and a need for additional training.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

This is a small feasibility study with four audiologists and 25 patient interviews, so it cannot show that the interview tool improves patient outcomes. The data are mainly audiologists' reflections and a group interview, not direct patient outcomes or patient-reported experiences. The study was done in one Swedish audiology clinic, where hearing care is taxpayer-funded and audiologists provide the rehabilitation, so it may not transfer to other health systems or professions. The interview tool was unpublished and used after an education period, without a control group or randomisation. The audiologists reported that rehabilitation plans were largely unchanged, so the study does not show how the interview content changes clinical decisions.

Declared interests

The project was funded by the Department of Audiology and the Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University. The authors declared no commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a conflict of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read this as proof that the interview tool improves hearing outcomes or changes rehabilitation. It reports four audiologists' experiences over 25 interviews, and the rehabilitation plans were largely unchanged.

Read it on PubMed →