PTOTSLPOtherFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2025

Enhancing assistive technology knowledge through WHO's training in assistive products (TAP): a pre-post quasi-experimental study in Italian undergraduate healthcare education.

Gessica Della Bella, Donatella Valente, Justine Gosling and 1 others

PMID 41695386

WHAT IT FOUND

Undergraduate physiotherapy, nursing, and developmental therapy students improved their knowledge of assistive products after completing WHO's TAP training.

Gains were largest for mobility and transfer devices. The study measured test scores only, so it does not show that these students became better clinicians.

Key findings

01Students demonstrated statistically significant gains in median knowledge scores across all three TAP modules, with large effect sizes.

02Physiotherapy students showed no significant improvement in the introductory module, while nursing and developmental therapy students achieved large, significant gains.

03In the mobility module, physiotherapy and developmental therapy students significantly outperformed nursing students both before and after training.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTsWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study used a pre-post design with no control group, so it cannot rule out that knowledge gains were due to other concurrent coursework or simply taking the test twice. Only students who completed both assessments were analyzed, which may introduce selection bias if more motivated students were more likely to finish. The study measured knowledge via a multiple-choice test only; it did not evaluate practical skills or changes in clinical performance. The TAP materials were translated by the trainer and not an official WHO version, which may affect fidelity. Occupational therapy students were not included, limiting generalizability to the full interprofessional team.

Declared interests

The work was supported in part by the Italian Ministry of Health with 'Current Research funds'. The authors declared financial support for the work or its publication.

The easy way to misread this

Do not assume that improved test scores equate to improved clinical competence or safer patient care. The study only measured knowledge via multiple-choice questions and did not assess practical skills or real-world application of assistive technology.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →