OTCohortWork (Reading, Mass.)2018

Employment exit and entry among U.S. adults with and without arthritis during the Great Recession. A longitudinal study: 2007-2009, NHIS/MEPS.

K A Theis, D Roblin, C G Helmick and 1 others

PMID 29865104

WHAT IT FOUND

During the Great Recession, 27.0% of U.S. adults with arthritis stopped work versus 16.8% without; 24.8% started work versus 38.7%.

After adjustment, the arthritis association with lower work entry was null.

Key findings

01By the end of the study period, 27.0% of adults with arthritis stopped work, compared with 16.8% of adults without arthritis.

02By the end of the study period, 24.8% of adults with arthritis started work, compared with 38.7% of adults without arthritis.

03In the fully adjusted model, arthritis was associated with 50% greater risk of stopping work (HR = 1.5, 95% CI = 1.1-2.0), but adjusted models did not show a significant arthritis association with starting work.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

All information was self-reported, including arthritis status, so some people may have been misclassified. The study was observational and not an experimental design, so it cannot prove that arthritis caused work loss or prevented work entry. The overall decline in employment during the recession was not statistically significant in either group. After adjustment, the lower chance of starting work associated with arthritis was no longer statistically significant, so the work-entry finding is uncertain. Participants aged 18 to 29 were excluded, so results do not cover younger adults.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that arthritis alone caused the higher work-loss rate or that workplace accommodations will prevent job loss. This was an observational survey with self-reported arthritis, and the adjusted models did not show a significant lower chance of starting work.

Read it on PubMed →