Empathy and Autism: Establishing the Structure and Different Manifestations of Empathy in Autistic Individuals Using the Perth Empathy Scale.
Jack D Brett, David A Preece, Rodrigo Becerra and 2 others
PMID 39115741WHAT IT FOUND
Autistic adults reported lower cognitive and affective empathy than non-autistic adults on the Perth Empathy Scale.
However, affective empathy varied much more widely within the autistic group, so average scores do not describe every individual. The total score also misses important detail; use subscales instead.
Key findings
01The total empathy score does not capture all the information the subscales do, so clinicians should report subscale scores rather than relying on a single total.
02Autistic adults reported lower cognitive empathy and lower affective empathy for both positive and negative emotions compared with non-autistic adults.
03Affective empathy varied much more within the autistic group than the non-autistic group, so the average difference should not be applied to any single autistic client.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Everyone completed the questionnaire online and self-reported their empathy, so people had to be able to read and understand the items. This excludes autistic people with lower literacy or cognitive skills, who may have a different empathic profile. The study did not verify anyone's autism diagnosis; it relied on participants reporting a diagnosis from a clinician. The two groups were not well matched: the autistic group was older and had fewer females, which the analysis tried to adjust for but may still have affected the results. Almost all participants were from Western countries, and gender-diverse people were excluded, so the findings may not generalise to other groups. Self-report measures capture how people think they empathise, which can differ from how they actually behave in empathy tasks.
Declared interests
Funded by the University of Western Australia. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read the group averages as a description of any individual autistic client. Affective empathy varied much more within the autistic group than the non-autistic group, so some autistic people report high affective empathy and others low. The authors themselves say the average difference should be taken with caution for this reason.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →