PTOtherJournal of physical therapy science2017

Electromyographic analysis of constraint-induced movement therapy effects in patients after stroke in chronic course.

Mariéle Marchezan Zarantonello, Marco Antonio Stefani, João Carlos Comel

PMID 29200616

WHAT IT FOUND

After 10 days of constraint-induced movement therapy, 5 chronic-stroke patients showed lower resting biceps electrical activity and higher contraction activity except in case V.

Reported arm use, quality, task speed, and independence improved. Only before-and-after results were reported, so the therapy alone cannot be credited.

Key findings

01Resting biceps EMG signals decreased after CIMT in 5 patients.

02Biceps contraction EMG signals increased after CIMT except in case V.

03Motor Activity Log amount-of-movement mean improved from 0.45 to 2.8 and quality-of-movement from 0.40 to 2.3; Wolf Motor Function Test time reduced by mean 4.62 sec ± 3.27.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Only 5 patients were studied, and the paper itself calls the small sample a limitation. The paper reports only before-and-after results, so improvement after CIMT cannot be separated from time, selection, or other therapy. Patients already attended physical therapy, and the paper does not state whether usual therapy continued, so the effect of CIMT alone cannot be isolated. Surface EMG was limited to the biceps, and the paper notes surface EMG fails to detect deep or small muscles. The Motor Activity Log was self-scored by patients, and the Modified Ashworth Scale is described as ordinal and possibly not sensitive enough for spasticity changes.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that constraint-induced movement therapy caused reduced spasticity or better arm function. Only 5 patients were measured before and after, and they already attended physical therapy, so the changes cannot be separated from other factors.

Read it on PubMed →