Electroconvulsive Therapy for Catatonia in Autistic and Non-Autistic Patients: An Observational Study on Course, Efficacy, Aggression, and Self-Injury Outcomes.
Joshua Ryan Smith, Maria Bonnee, Sarah Marler and 13 others
PMID 42708329WHAT IT FOUND
Both autistic and non-autistic patients with catatonia improved during ECT while also receiving medication and, in some cases, ABA.
Autistic patients needed longer courses and more maintenance, especially with intellectual disability, and self-injury decreased.
Key findings
01Both autistic and non-autistic patients had significant baseline-to-last reductions in catatonia and global severity scores.
02Autistic patients had higher unadjusted treatment burden: median 35 versus 14 sessions and median 342 versus 97 days.
03In autistic patients, self-injury decreased from 15 of 35 at first assessment to 6 of 35 at last assessment.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
This was a single-site observational study with no control group, so it cannot prove that ECT caused the improvements. Raters who scored global improvement and severity were not blinded to the patient's treatment course. All patients were receiving psychiatric medication while receiving ECT, and some were also receiving applied behavior analysis, so the contribution of ECT alone cannot be separated. Autism and intellectual disability were highly correlated: 88.4% of autistic patients had intellectual disability, compared with 11.9% of non-autistic patients, and the autism-without-intellectual-disability group had only five patients. Cognitive adverse effects were not formally tested; memory complaints came from patient or caregiver reports, so true cognitive effects may be missed. Neither the Bush-Francis nor Kanner catatonia scale was formally validated in autistic patients or children with catatonia. Analyses used available data without imputation, and denominators differed across outcomes. ECT technique changed over the 4-year study period, including more frequent second stimulations, although calendar year was adjusted for. Patients entered treatment at different times, creating unequal follow-up and censoring for treatment burden.
Declared interests
Authors declared: J.R.S. received funding from Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institute of Mental Health, Axial Therapeutics, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Vanda Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Roche. Z.J.W. serves on scientific advisory boards of Autism Speaks and SPARK (Simons Foundation), holds equity in Bristol Myers Squibb, and has received consulting fees from Roche. J.E.W. receives funding from the Department of Veterans Affairs, Bristol Myers Squibb, AC-Immune, and Ono Pharmaceuticals. J.L. receives funding from Harvard Medical School, the Rappaport Foundation, the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health, and the Foundation for Prader-Willi Research, holds equity and has received consulting income from Revival Therapeutics Inc., and has consulting fees from Soleno Therapeutics. The other authors declared no conflicts of interest. Vanderbilt University Medical Center's Microsoft 365 Copilot was used for statistical code development, documentation, and consistency checks under author supervision.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read the improvement as proof that ECT alone worked. Patients were also receiving psychiatric medication and some received applied behavior analysis, and the study had no control group or blinded raters.