PTRCTJMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies2026

Efficacy of High-Intensity Laser Therapy Combined With Plantar Fascia Stretching Exercises in the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis: Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial.

Nantaporn Jitpimolmard, Phonlawat Ouemphancharoen, Preeda Arayawichanon

PMID 41719484

WHAT IT FOUND

Adding high-intensity laser therapy to standard plantar fascia stretching exercises did not reduce pain or improve function any more than sham laser plus stretching.

Both groups improved similarly, suggesting the stretching program itself drives the clinical benefit.

Key findings

01There was no significant difference in pain scores between the laser and sham groups after treatment.

02Plantar fascia thickness decreased significantly in both groups, but the change was not different between the laser and sham groups.

03Foot and ankle function improved in both groups, but the improvement was not significantly different between the laser and sham groups.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study only measured outcomes immediately after the final treatment session, so it is unknown if the benefits of stretching last longer than those of laser therapy or if differences emerge over time. The sample size was relatively small and powered to detect a large difference in pain scores, which may have made it difficult to identify smaller, potentially clinically relevant benefits. Most participants had slightly supinated feet, so the results may not apply to patients with flat feet or overpronation. Participants were instructed to avoid strenuous weight-bearing exercises, which could confound the results if adherence to this restriction varied.

Declared interests

The study was funded by the Research and Innovation Division, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Thailand. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that stretching is ineffective because the laser group did not outperform the sham group. Both groups improved significantly, indicating that the stretching program was effective on its own. The lack of difference means the laser added nothing to the stretching, not that the stretching failed.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →