Efficacy and Effectiveness of Advanced Hearing Aid Directional and Noise Reduction Technologies for Older Adults With Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss.
Yu-Hsiang Wu, Elizabeth Stangl, Octav Chipara and 3 others
PMID 30379683WHAT IT FOUND
Premium directional and noise reduction hearing aid features improved laboratory speech test scores but did not produce clear real-world benefit over basic features in older adults with mild-to-moderate hearing loss.
Key findings
01In controlled laboratory speech tests, premium directional and noise reduction hearing aid features outperformed basic features: the premium-on condition gave better speech recognition in noise scores than the basic-on condition in four of five listening conditions.
02In real-world self-reports, premium features and premium hearing aids did not show a robust advantage over basic options.
03Turning directional and noise reduction features on was associated with higher real-world satisfaction than turning them off, across both basic and premium hearing aids.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The analysed sample was 54 older adults with mild-to-moderate hearing loss, all native English speakers from eastern Iowa and northwestern Illinois; six participants withdrew. The findings may not apply to people with more severe hearing loss, different languages, urban areas, or very active lifestyles. All hearing aids were from one manufacturer and were the same hardware and chip, with only two models released in 2013, so results may not generalize to other premium or basic hearing aids. Volume controls were disabled, feature settings were left at default, and participants received brief instructions about manual programs to protect blinding. This may limit generalizability to clinical fittings and may have underestimated the benefit of premium features. The study examined premium directional and noise reduction features as a set, so it could not identify which specific premium feature caused any effect. Real-world outcomes relied on self-reports, which may not match behavioral or physiological measures of listening effort. Only 10.9% of the analysed smartphone surveys were in noisy or very noisy situations. Speech understanding scores were high in quieter situations, so there was little room to detect a hearing aid feature benefit in everyday life. The blinding procedures may have inflated feature-off outcomes because participants were told the devices were fully automatic and had no selectable programs. The windy condition result should be viewed as the combined effect of wind noise reduction and gain-reduction noise reduction, not wind noise reduction alone.
Declared interests
The supplied text lists research support from the N.I.H. extramural program and non-U.S. government sources. It does not include an author conflict-of-interest declaration.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that premium directional and noise reduction hearing aid features reliably improve everyday communication. The laboratory speech gains did not translate into robust real-world self-report benefits, and one premium condition combining wind noise reduction and gain-reduction noise reduction was associated with worse listening effort preference.