SLPRCTJournal of autism and developmental disorders2023

Effects of Social Skills Training for Adolescents on the Autism Spectrum: a Randomized Controlled Trial of the Polish Adaptation of the PEERS® Intervention via Hybrid and In-Person Delivery.

Mateusz Płatos, Kinga Wojaczek, Elizabeth A Laugeson

PMID 36001196

WHAT IT FOUND

Adolescents on the autism spectrum who received the adapted PEERS package improved in social skills knowledge and parent-reported peer socialization more than those waiting.

Hybrid online and in-person delivery produced similar gains, but the trial was small.

Key findings

01Compared with waiting, the treatment group showed greater improvement in teen-reported social skills knowledge, get-togethers, parent-reported conflict, parent-reported autism symptoms, and peer socialization.

02The treatment group received 16 sessions, with the last 7 delivered online, and hybrid delivery did not show significantly different improvement compared with in-person delivery.

03At about six months after treatment, most gains remained, but teen-reported get-togethers decreased and teen-reported conflict did not change significantly.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The final analysed sample was small: 29 adolescents, 12 in treatment and 17 in waitlist control, after 38 of 74 eligible adolescents were excluded and several withdrew or were excluded for low attendance. Outcome assessors were not blinded, and the main results came from teen and parent report, so expectations could have influenced ratings. Follow-up was based on 16 adolescents after response rates of 58.3% and 60.0%, so maintenance findings are vulnerable to attrition bias and were not compared separately between the original treatment and waitlist groups. The comparison of hybrid and in-person delivery was not planned, and the two modes happened in different periods with different COVID-19 restrictions, so it cannot prove equivalence. About one-third in each group reported concurrent treatment, mostly psychotherapy, and the PEERS package included teen sessions, parent coaching, homework, and role-play videos, so the contribution of any single component cannot be separated. Participants had IQ above 70, no major co-existing psychiatric disorder, no oppositional or aggressive behaviour outside the family, motivation to attend, and an available caregiver, so findings may not apply to adolescents with more severe co-occurring conditions or less caregiver support. All participants were Caucasian/White and the program was a Polish adaptation, so generalisability to other cultures and delivery systems is limited.

Declared interests

Funding was provided by the State Fund for the Rehabilitation of the Disabled People (PFRON) and the Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that hybrid delivery is proven equivalent to in-person delivery for all autistic adolescents. The hybrid comparison was not a planned goal, the hybrid and in-person groups were treated at different times with different COVID-19 restrictions, and the analysis only showed no significant differences.

Read it on PubMed →