PTPilotTopics in stroke rehabilitation2018

Effects of real-time gait biofeedback on paretic propulsion and gait biomechanics in individuals post-stroke.

Katlin Genthe, Christopher Schenck, Steven Eicholtz and 3 others

PMID 29457532

WHAT IT FOUND

In nine people post-stroke, one 18-minute treadmill session with real-time feedback on paretic push-off increased paretic propulsion, and the higher force remained for up to 30 minutes without feedback.

The non-paretic leg did not change. This is short-term lab biomechanics, not lasting walking improvement.

Key findings

01Paretic push-off force differed significantly from pre-training at the 2-minute, 15-minute, and 30-minute retention tests.

02Non-paretic push-off force did not change significantly over time after training.

03When the first biofeedback bout was compared with a 6-minute walking bout without biofeedback, paretic push-off force showed a significant effect of training type.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Nine participants were analysed, so the study cannot establish how many patients would respond or how durable the response would be. The study tested only one short session and retention only up to 30 minutes, so it does not show whether effects last after days, weeks, or repeated training. Outcomes were laboratory treadmill gait biomechanics, not over-ground walking, speed, endurance, balance, or daily function. The control comparison was only a 6-minute no-biofeedback bout against the first biofeedback bout; the full 18-minute biofeedback training was not compared with a separate control session. The same target push-off force was used throughout training, and target selection relied on brief 30-second trials and a 50% success rule. Feedback was intermittent 1-minute on/off without a faded feedback schedule, and the study did not explore optimal dosage or feedback frequency. Participants had to be able to walk on a treadmill for 6 minutes and communicate with investigators, and two screened participants were excluded for hemi-neglect or inability to follow instructions, so results may not apply to more severely affected or cognitively impaired patients. The supplied methods do not describe randomisation or blinding of outcome assessment.

Declared interests

The paper is labelled as supported by NIH extramural research funding. The supplied text does not include an author conflicts-of-interest declaration.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that this biofeedback improves long-term walking or function. The study measured nine people in one laboratory session, with retention only up to 30 minutes and no over-ground or functional outcomes.

Read it on PubMed →