PTOtherJournal of physical therapy science2019

Effects of health promoting education program for Korean middle-aged women.

Soonyoung Park, Hee Yeon Yeom, Sohyune R Sok

PMID 30774196

WHAT IT FOUND

Korean middle-aged women had higher self-efficacy, health-promoting behavior, and quality of life scores after a six-week bundle of lectures, books, audio-visual materials, models, exhibitions, and group discussion than women who received no program.

Key findings

01Post-test mean self-efficacy was 26.97 in the program group and 19.07 in the no-program group on a 7 to 35 scale.

02Post-test mean health promoting behavior was 180.67 in the program group and 141.83 in the no-program group on a 43 to 215 scale.

03Post-test mean quality of life was 168.83 in the program group and 132.07 in the no-program group on a 44 to 220 scale.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Participants were recruited by convenience sampling from a community centre in Seoul, so the findings may not apply to other regions or settings. The study was not randomised, and the control group received no program, so attention, expectations, or unmeasured baseline differences may explain some of the effect. Outcomes were self-reported questionnaires, and the paper did not identify a single primary outcome, so the positive findings are not protected against chance. The only post-test was immediately after the six-week program, so it is unknown whether the changes lasted. The reported religion percentages in the results text do not match the general characteristics table, which raises a possible reporting inconsistency.

Declared interests

The authors declared no conflict of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that education alone caused the improvements. The intervention combined lectures, books, audio-visual materials, models, exhibitions, and group discussion, so the contribution of any single component cannot be separated. The study also used a non-randomised convenience sample, so attention or baseline differences cannot be ruled out.

Read it on PubMed →