PTMeta-AnalysisPM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation2024

Effects of exercise on bone density and physical performance in postmenopausal women: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hsin-Hui Hsu, Ching-Ya Chiu, Wei-Chen Chen and 2 others

PMID 39032163

WHAT IT FOUND

Adding exercise to osteoporosis medication or supplements did not improve bone density at the spine, hip or trochanter, but it did improve balance, walking speed and leg strength.

Evidence quality was low to very low.

Key findings

01Adding exercise training to osteoporosis medicine or supplements made no difference to bone mineral density at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, trochanter or total hip.

02Balance and mobility improved more when exercise was added: on the Berg Balance Scale the difference was 0.72 and on the Timed Up and Go it was -1.07, both statistically significant.

03Leg extensor strength improved substantially with added exercise (1.77) but handgrip strength did not (0.20).

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The exercise programmes were all different in type, dose and duration, so the review cannot say which exercise works best or how much is needed. Only 4 of the 19 trials described how they hid which group a woman was assigned to, and about 80% could not blind participants or staff, so some of the improvements could reflect expectation rather than exercise. Study quality was middling: PEDro scores ranged from 4 to 8 with a median of 5 out of 10, and most trials did not analyse everyone as originally assigned. No included trial reported fractures and only one reported the number of falls, so this review cannot say whether adding exercise prevents fractures or falls. Every outcome was graded low or very low certainty, mostly because of risk of bias, inconsistency between studies, imprecise results, and signs of publication bias. Only a limited range of medicines and supplements was used, so the review could not examine how exercise interacts with different drugs.

Declared interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The work was funded by the National Science and Technology Council.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read this as proof that exercise protects bone. Bone density was unchanged at every site measured, and no included trial reported fractures. The balance and strength improvements each rest on only three or four small trials, and the review team graded every single outcome as low or very low certainty, so treat those results as promising rather than established.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →