Effects of Combined and Alone Transcranial Motor Cortex Stimulation and Mirror Therapy in Phantom Limb Pain: A Randomized Factorial Trial.
Muhammed Enes Gunduz, Kevin Pacheco-Barrios, Camila Bonin Pinto and 9 others
PMID 34060934WHAT IT FOUND
No added benefit from combining motor cortex stimulation and mirror therapy.
Active stimulation reduced phantom limb pain more than sham; mirror therapy did not outperform covered mirror.
Key findings
01Active motor cortex tDCS reduced phantom limb pain compared with sham tDCS, while mirror therapy did not significantly outperform a covered-mirror control.
02There was no significant interaction between tDCS and mirror therapy, meaning the combination did not produce a greater pain effect than the separate effects.
03Active tDCS changed motor cortex excitability in the affected hemisphere, and a change in intracortical inhibition correlated with pain reduction.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Only traumatic lower-limb amputees were included, so the results do not apply to upper-limb, congenital, oncological, or nontraumatic amputees. The number randomized was smaller than the target sample, and some participants dropped out, which reduces confidence in the precision of the findings. Time since amputation was imbalanced in one group, which may have affected the comparison. Mirror therapy could not be fully blinded, so expectations and attention may have influenced the control condition. The covered-mirror control may have had real therapeutic effects, so the trial cannot separate specific mirror feedback from movement, imagery, attention, or placebo. TMS was measured in the hand area rather than the leg area. This does not directly assess the cortical representation of the amputated limb. Predictor analyses were post hoc and should be treated as hypothesis-generating.
Declared interests
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, or publication.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that adding mirror therapy to tDCS gives extra pain relief. The interaction was not significant, and active mirror therapy did not beat a covered-mirror control.