Effects of aquatic walking exercise using a walker in a chronic stroke patient.
Tadashi Matsuda, Yoshiteru Akezaki
PMID 28744062WHAT IT FOUND
A chronic stroke patient walked farther in water and on land after water walking, land walking, and a walker.
Satisfaction improved in the caregiver questionnaire. This single case cannot separate the components or prove the method works.
Key findings
01Continuous aquatic walking distance reached 5 m, and continuous land walking with a walker reached 26 m.
02The patient received water walking, land walking, a walker, a modified grip attachment, and sometimes weight belts, so the contribution of any single component cannot be separated.
03The caregiver questionnaire improved in 6 of 9 items, while physical function and ADL changes were small or absent, with grip strength changes, FIM from 66 to 67, and no difference on FMA right, BRS, VAS, or BI.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Only one patient was evaluated, so the results cannot show what happens in other patients. No control group or statistical analysis was used, so improvement cannot be separated from time or other care. The patient received water walking, land walking, a walker, a grip attachment, and sometimes weight belts, so the effect of any one component is unknown. The study did not evaluate whether gains carried over to the home environment. Physical function and ADL changes were small or absent, and the report contains an inconsistency about satisfaction: one sentence says VAS showed no difference, while the caregiver table reports improved satisfaction.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that aquatic walking with a walker caused the improvements. This was one patient, and the program combined water walking, land walking, a walker, a grip modification, and sometimes weight belts, with no control group or statistical analysis.