PTRCTJournal of intellectual disability research : JIDR2022

Effects of 24-week basketball programme on body composition and functional fitness on adults with Down syndrome.

W Cai, S-S Baek

PMID 35642288

WHAT IT FOUND

A 24-week basketball programme improved body composition and fitness in adults with Down syndrome, with lower body mass, BMI and waist size and better balance, flexibility, aerobic capacity and basketball skills than the control group, whose scores did not change.

Key findings

01The exercise group improved on every body composition and fitness measure except waist-to-hip ratio, while the control group showed no significant change on any measure except the standing long jump.

02On the post-test, the exercise group had significantly lower body mass, BMI, waist and hip circumference and waist-to-height ratio, and better flexibility, sit-and-reach, curl-ups, aerobic capacity, static and dynamic balance and basketball ability than the control group.

03Adherence was high: 10 of the 11 participants in the exercise group attended more than 90% of sessions, average attendance was 96.7%, and no serious or adverse events occurred.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Only 22 adults were analysed, all from one association in one city in China; the authors themselves note that the similar ages and uneven gender mix (18 men, 4 women) limit how far the results can be generalised. No intelligence quotient records were available, so the level of intellectual impairment in the group is unknown. There was no guarantee that participants exercised at maximum effort; exercise intensity and heart rate were not monitored. The paper calls the design quasi-experimental even though allocation was decided by drawing a number from a hat, and it states an intention-to-treat approach while the analysis appears to include only those who completed the final test (one control participant left, and the control group is reported as 11 people). The paper does not say whether the people doing the testing knew which group each participant was in, and the control group had no structured activity; extra coaching attention in the exercise group could have contributed to the changes. Almost everyone in the exercise group attended nearly every session and everyone completed all the tests, so this says little about adults with Down syndrome who need more support to take part.

Declared interests

Funded by the Anhui Provincial Philosophy and Social Science Foundation (AHSKY2020D78) and the University Natural Science Research Project of Anhui Province (KJ2020A0059), both public research funds. The authors declared no conflicts of interest, and no company selling the intervention was involved.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read this as proof that basketball will work for every adult with Down syndrome. Only 22 people took part, all recruited from one association in one city, and anyone with heart disease, another chronic illness or difficulty understanding instructions was excluded, so the sample was relatively able. The sessions were run by three qualified basketball coaches, which many services could not provide.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →