Effect of the Multicomponent Exercise Program MoveUS on the Kinematic Fatigue of People With Glenohumeral Instability: A Secondary Analysis From a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Laura Ramírez-Pérez, Antonio Ignacio Cuesta-Vargas
PMID 42361116WHAT IT FOUND
A 12-week supervised multicomponent shoulder programme (MoveUS) delayed movement fatigue more than usual care in people with glenohumeral instability, on every repetitive task tested, with large differences.
Peak performance was unchanged. The trial was small, therapists could not be blinded, and the analysis was exploratory.
Key findings
01Time to fatigue improved more with MoveUS than with usual care on every repetitive task tested, for both linear acceleration and angular velocity, and the effects were large (Cohen's d 0.8 to 1.8).
02In the 120-second functional test, the model estimated that MoveUS patients kept moving 16.63 seconds longer than controls for linear acceleration, and 31 seconds longer for angular velocity.
03Percentage of fatigue improved only in the 120-second functional test (p = 0.020 for linear acceleration; p = 0.001 for angular velocity); other tasks showed no significant difference, and the reference point (peak performance) did not change.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Small and underpowered for these outcomes: 47 people were recruited and 38 reached the 24-week follow-up, and the original trial was designed and powered around a different primary endpoint (the WOSI). Kinematic fatigue is described by the authors as an exploratory, performance-based construct rather than a validated measure of muscle fatigue, and there is no established minimal clinically important difference for it in this population, so it is unclear whether the delayed fatigue means anything patients would notice. Many outcomes and tasks were analysed with no correction for multiple comparisons, so some significant results may be chance findings. The sample was heterogeneous (traumatic and atraumatic instability, different jobs and sports) and the groups were not balanced at baseline, with a higher proportion of atraumatic cases in the standard care group, which the authors say may influence how people respond. Patients and treating therapists could not be blinded; only the assessor was. The usual care comparator was relatively low intensity, which the authors say may amplify the apparent effect of the experimental programme compared with a more intensive comparison. The single wrist-mounted sensor reflects the whole arm rather than the shoulder joint alone, and skin-mounted sensors can pick up artefacts such as sweat.
Declared interests
Government funded: a predoctoral grant from the Spanish Ministry of Universities (FPU21/06296), co-financed with FEDER funds through a University of Malaga research group grant (CTS-631), with open access costs paid by the University of Malaga. The authors declare no conflicts of interest, and no company selling the equipment or programme was involved.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read this as proof that MoveUS improves shoulder function or reduces instability. What was measured was how long people could keep repeating a movement before their pace slowed, using a wrist sensor on an exploratory measure with no known threshold for clinical importance, in a small secondary analysis of a trial designed for a different question. Nothing here shows an effect on pain, recurrence or what patients can do in daily life.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →