PTOTRCTJournal of physical therapy science2022

Effect of education on physical and occupational therapists' perceptions of clinical practice guidelines and shared decision making: a randomized controlled trial.

Shuhei Fujimoto, Tatsuya Ogawa, Kanako Komukai and 1 others

PMID 35698556

WHAT IT FOUND

Therapists who attended a workshop combining clinical guidelines with shared decision-making reported higher confidence in evidence-based practice than those who took separate lectures.

The workshop focused on using guidelines to discuss patient preferences and treatment options together.

Key findings

01The combined workshop group reported higher mean self-efficacy scores on the EPIC scale after the intervention compared to both the separate guideline-lecture group and the separate shared-decision-making-lecture group.

02The combined group scored significantly higher than the other two groups on three specific EPIC items: effectively conducting an online literature search, asking about patient needs and preferences, and deciding on a course of action.

03On a secondary questionnaire about evidence-based practice, the combined group and the guideline-only group differed significantly on the item about learning the foundations of evidence-based practice during academic preparation.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study measured self-reported confidence (self-efficacy) in evidence-based practice, not actual changes in clinical behavior or patient outcomes. We do not know if therapists who attended the workshop actually used guidelines or shared decision-making differently with patients. All participants were from Japanese medical institutions, and the authors note that Japanese therapists generally have lower awareness of clinical guidelines compared to therapists in Western countries. The results may not apply to therapists in other countries with different educational backgrounds. The study recruited therapists from facilities that agreed to participate in research on these topics, which may mean the participants already had a higher interest or baseline knowledge in shared decision-making and guidelines than the general therapist population. The intervention was a single two-hour session. The study does not show how long the increase in self-efficacy lasted or whether it required ongoing support to maintain. The randomization method was changed during the study from the originally registered protocol, though the authors state there was no deviation from the overall study protocol.

Declared interests

The work was supported by a grant from the Japan Primary Care Association. The authors declared no competing interests.

The easy way to misread this

Do not interpret the increased self-efficacy scores as evidence that therapists changed their clinical practice or that patients received better care. The study only measured participants' reported confidence in using evidence-based practice immediately after a two-hour educational session.

Read it on PubMed →