PTOTRCTHong Kong physiotherapy journal : official publication of the Hong Kong Physiotherapy Association Limited = Wu li chih liao2026

Effect of core stability exercise training on activities of daily living, fatigue level and balance in haemodialysis patients: A randomised controlled study.

Mohammed Youssef Elhamrawy, Ahmed Fahmy, Omneya Mohamed Darrag and 3 others

PMID 42016048

WHAT IT FOUND

Core stability exercises added to a breathing programme improved daily living independence, fatigue, balance and thinking and memory more than breathing alone, in 60 haemodialysis patients over 12 weeks.

Both groups improved; the added exercises gave the extra gain.

Key findings

01Independence in daily activities improved by 16.8 points on the 100-point Barthel Index in the study group against 7.4 points in the control group, a difference of 9.4 points (95% CI 6.8 to 12.0) in favour of the combined programme.

02Fatigue fell by 11.2 points on the 10-to-50 Fatigue Assessment Scale in the study group against 6.4 points in controls, a difference of 4.8 points (95% CI 7.1 to 2.5).

03Timed up and go time fell by 6.8 seconds in the study group against 4.2 seconds in controls, a difference of 2.6 seconds (95% CI 3.5 to 1.7).

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The paper never says whether the people assessing balance, daily activities or cognition knew which group each patient was in. Fatigue and the Barthel Index are partly self-reported, so knowing they were in the extra-exercise group could have inflated the study group's scores. Both groups exercised and both improved. The only thing tested was whether adding core stability work to breathing helped, so this trial says nothing about exercise versus no exercise in dialysis patients. The study group spent 30 to 45 minutes longer training each session than the control group, so the extra benefit cannot be separated from the extra training time and therapist attention. There is no follow-up after the 12 weeks, so it is not known whether the gains survive once the programme stops. It was a single centre in Egypt, only patients aged 50 to 65 were included, and people with a BMI of 30 or higher, heart or lung disease, dementia or unstable medical conditions were excluded. The results do not apply to frailer or more multimorbid dialysis patients. No dropouts are reported, even though 30 patients per group were recruited to allow for them, so it is unclear whether all 60 finished the programme. The Discussion offers mechanisms, such as strengthening the deep trunk muscles and switching on the parasympathetic nervous system, that were not measured in this trial. The stated aims describe cognition as a secondary outcome, but the analysis section calls all four outcomes primary.

Declared interests

The authors state that the research received no external funding and that they have no conflict of interest to declare. The trial was approved by the Faculty of Physical Therapy Research Ethics Committee at Delta University, Egypt, and registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06445647).

The easy way to misread this

Do not read this as proof that core stability training is the active ingredient. The control group did breathing exercises only, so the study group also did 30 to 45 minutes more exercise per session, and the extra benefit may come from that extra training time and attention rather than from the core stability work itself. And because both groups exercised and both improved, this trial says nothing about exercise compared with no exercise.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →