PTRCTThe Journal of school health2022

Effect of Collaborative Care for Persistent Postconcussive Symptoms on Academic Function: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Frederick P Rivara, Lyscha A Marcynyszyn, Jin Wang and 7 others

PMID 34904238

WHAT IT FOUND

Teens with persistent concussion symptoms who received collaborative care did not improve grades or school problems more than usual care.

They did miss fewer school days. The package included cognitive-behavioral therapy, care management, and medication consultation when warranted.

Key findings

01No significant differences were reported between collaborative care and usual care in new or worsening school problems, symptoms interfering with school, headaches interfering with school, diminished academic skills, or the youth's main academic concern.

02Grade point averages declined after concussion in both groups, and the between-group difference was not statistically significant.

03The collaborative care package, which included cognitive-behavioral therapy, care management, and medication consultation when warranted, was associated with fewer missed school days than usual care, and the study cannot separate the contribution of any single component.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The participants had symptoms lasting at least 1 month after injury, so the study does not show what would happen in adolescents presenting earlier. The sample was mostly White and parents were mostly college or graduate educated, so generalisability to more diverse or lower-resource families is limited. Usual care was not standardized, and the study did not measure school accommodations or school and community resources, which could affect academic outcomes. Much of the data relied on parent self-report, and parental education could not be measured as a driver of outcomes. The intervention combined cognitive-behavioral therapy, care management, and medication consultation when warranted, so the study cannot separate the contribution of any single component. The paper does not explicitly name a primary endpoint, so the academic-function results are harder to rank against secondary findings.

Declared interests

An author reported non-paid board positions, a book royalty, and consulting fees from Optum; another author reported grant funding from the National Collegiate Athletic Association and the Pac-12; the other authors declared no conflicts. The article is categorized as NIH extramural research support, but the conflict statement does not name a study sponsor.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that collaborative care improved academic performance. The academic outcomes did not show a significant group difference, and only school absences were lower. Because the intervention combined cognitive-behavioral therapy, care management, and medication consultation when warranted, the study cannot show which component caused the reduction in absences.

Read it on PubMed →