PTRNOtherWestern journal of nursing research2025

Education Programs for Patients With Parkinson's Disease Receiving Deep Brain Stimulation: A Scoping Review.

Monica Petralito, Chiara Tedesco, Gianluca Pucciarelli and 5 others

PMID 40411366

WHAT IT FOUND

Seven studies describe patient education for Parkinson's disease with deep brain stimulation.

Nurses, therapists, and physicians delivered materials, apps, and counselling. Reported outcomes included better social adjustment, satisfaction, and mobility, but the evidence is too small and varied to prove benefit.

Key findings

01Only seven studies met inclusion criteria for explicitly described educational programs for patients with Parkinson's disease undergoing deep brain stimulation.

02Nurses were directly involved in delivering education in three studies, and physiotherapists, occupational therapists, neurologists, and psychotherapists also contributed.

03Included studies reported better social adjustment, physical performance, independence, and satisfaction among patients and caregivers in educational programs.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Only seven studies were included, and they varied widely from apps to pamphlets to exercise programmes, so the review cannot identify a best education approach. The authors did not assess risk of bias or quality of the seven studies, so reported positive outcomes may overstate benefit. High-income countries accounted for 86% of research output (n=6), so findings may not apply where resources differ. The review included English or Italian papers, and its stated limitation says an English focus may have missed relevant research. Outcomes relied partly on patient-reported social adjustment, which can be influenced by perception.

Declared interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest. The supplied text does not state a funding source.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read this review as proof that patient education improves outcomes after deep brain stimulation. It mapped only seven heterogeneous studies and did not assess their quality, so the reported improvements are not established effects.

Read it on PubMed →