Early-Literacy Intervention Conducted by Caregivers of Children with Language Impairment: Implementation Patterns Using Survival Analysis.
Laura M Justice, Jing Chen, Hui Jiang and 2 others
PMID 30790193WHAT IT FOUND
Only 70 of 128 caregivers completed the 15-week home reading program.
Most dropouts happened at the start; among reward, feedback, modeling, and encouragement, reward was associated with staying.
Key findings
01Only 70 of the 128 child-caregiver dyads were classified as completing the intervention.
02The largest number of dropouts, n = 25, occurred at time-point 0.
03Among the four tested supports, reward, feedback, modeling, and encouragement, families receiving reward had odds of withdrawing that were 51% of those not receiving reward.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study did not independently confirm language impairment or specify which language areas were affected. Families were already referred by SLPs and attending a hospital clinic, so results may not apply to caregivers who cannot access or obtain therapy services. Caregivers received the STAR book-reading program plus randomly assigned combinations of reward, feedback, modeling, and encouragement; the implementation findings are about this package, not one isolated support. Implementation fidelity of the home reading sessions was not measured. Completion was defined with tolerance for skipping up to three books, so it is not identical to perfect dosage. The sample included only children with primary language impairment aged 4 to 5 years 11 months, not children with autism, hearing loss, or other disabilities. The study reports caregiver retention and completion, not child language or literacy outcomes. The authors noted limited sample size for some regression analyses.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that reward alone caused completion. Caregivers received STAR plus randomly assigned combinations of reward, feedback, modeling, and encouragement, and the paper measured implementation, not child outcomes.