RNQualitativeJournal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN2024

Early Experiences of Parents of Children With Craniofacial Microsomia.

Alexis L Johns, Danielle McWilliams, Bruna Costa and 8 others

PMID 38320743

WHAT IT FOUND

Parents of children with craniofacial microsomia described shock and guilt after birth, often worsened by providers who seemed unfamiliar with the condition.

They found strength in nurses who offered clear information, neutral language, and early reassurance that the diagnosis was not the parents' fault.

Key findings

01Half of the participants reported negative birth experiences characterized by confusion, lack of information, and anxiety, while 39% did not have the opportunity to hold their children shortly after birth.

02Participants frequently sought information online because it was unavailable from providers, with 86% reporting they used independent information seeking to find strength.

03Nurses were described as a source of strength when they offered reassurance that the parents were not responsible for the diagnosis and used neutral language to describe the infant's features.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The sample was largely well-educated, White, and employed, which may not represent the experiences of families with fewer resources. The study relied on retrospective recall, as participants described experiences from 3 to 17 years prior, which introduces potential positive or negative memory bias. Fathers' perspectives were largely absent, with only one couple interviewed together. The unstructured narrative interview format meant that standardized topics were not covered, so the frequency of specific experiences may not be fully representative.

Declared interests

The study was part of a larger research program (CARE) supported by the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR). No specific conflicts of interest were declared in the provided text.

The easy way to misread this

Do not interpret the high percentage of parents reporting negative provider experiences as evidence that most providers are incompetent. The study highlights a gap in specific knowledge about rare conditions like CFM among general staff, rather than a lack of care. Additionally, the finding that many parents sought information online should not be read as a recommendation for self-diagnosis, but rather as a signal that providers need to offer accessible, reliable resources to prevent 'doomscrolling'.

Read it on PubMed →