SLPOtherDysphagia2024

Dysphagia Management in the Emergency Department: Using Concept Mapping to Identify Actionable Change to Improve Services.

Pranika B Lal, Elizabeth C Ward, Laurelie R Wishart and 5 others

PMID 38206345

WHAT IT FOUND

Emergency department and speech-language staff prioritised clearer communication about diet and fluids, easier access to speech-language pathology, and earlier identification of dysphagia.

They rated most changes important but hard to implement.

Key findings

01Staff grouped 53 service-change statements into 8 themes, with speech-language pathology and emergency department team collaboration the largest cluster (10 statements).

0217 statements were rated both highly important and highly changeable; 7 concerned communication, 4 concerned early identification or assessment timing, and the highest-rated was clear SLP documentation of recommendations.

03Participants rated all clusters as more important than changeable; education and training and SLP and ED collaboration were seen as most changeable, while staffing and resources were among the hardest to change.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study was done at a single hospital emergency department in Queensland, Australia, so the priorities may not fit other services or countries. The site used an expanded service model with proactive speech-language pathology screening, which is not common everywhere. Only 16 staff consented, and only 12 completed the sorting and rating tasks, so the views may not represent all emergency department or speech-language staff. Medical and executive staff were interviewed individually rather than in their professional groups, so they did not brainstorm together. The study took place during the COVID-19 pandemic, and workload and leave contributed to participant drop-out. The findings are staff perceptions of importance and changeability, not measured patient outcomes. Patients or carers were not included. The study did not test whether the identified changes improve services or patient care.

Declared interests

Funding was named as Queensland Health and The University of Queensland. The supplied text does not report author conflicts of interest beyond this funding statement.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the prioritised statements as evidence that changing documentation, education or referral processes improves dysphagia outcomes. The study recorded staff views of important and changeable service changes, not patient outcomes or tested interventions.

Read it on PubMed →