PTRCTJournal of physical therapy science2017

Dry cupping for plantar fasciitis: a randomized controlled trial.

Weiqing Ge, Chelsea Leson, Corey Vukovic

PMID 28603360

WHAT IT FOUND

For plantar fasciitis, dry cupping and electrical stimulation each improved pain and function, but neither was clearly better.

Key findings

01Both dry cupping and electrical stimulation reduced pain and increased function significantly in the tested group.

02Dry cupping did not differ significantly from electrical stimulation on any measured outcome.

03Average VAS pain decreased by 29.8 mm with dry cupping and 28.0 mm with electrical stimulation, with no significant between-group difference.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The sample was small, with 29 people, and recruited by convenience sampling from a university campus, so it may not represent typical patients. Participants were mostly young volunteers and the sample lacked diversity. The study was not double-blind, so participants and researchers could know the treatment. Treatments lasted only four weeks, and no longer-term follow-up is reported.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read this as proof that dry cupping outperforms electrical stimulation or standard care. The trial was small, unblinded, and found no significant between-group differences.

Read it on PubMed →