PTOTSLPOtherAutism : the international journal of research and practice2025

Do you feel me? Autism, empathic accuracy and the double empathy problem.

Rachael Ts Cheang, Maya Skjevling, Alexandra If Blakemore and 2 others

PMID 38757626

WHAT IT FOUND

General population participants were less accurate at tracking emotions of autistic narrators, especially for sadness and happiness.

However, they felt anger and fear from autistic narrators more intensely in their own bodies. This supports the double empathy problem: non-autistic people struggle to interpret autistic emotional expressions.

Key findings

01Participants showed significantly lower empathic accuracy when viewing autistic narrators compared to non-autistic narrators, specifically for sadness and happiness.

02Participants felt emotions from autistic narrators more intensely in their own bodies, particularly for anger and fear.

03There was no difference in participants' ability to cognitively identify or affectively share the specific emotion labels of autistic versus non-autistic narrators.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTsWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study only tested one side of the double empathy problem: non-autistic people understanding autistic people. It did not include diagnosed autistic participants, so we do not know if autistic people struggle to understand non-autistic narrators. Participants were not screened for autistic diagnoses; they were assumed to be non-autistic based on mean AQ scores below the clinical cut-off. The narrators were all White, highly educated, and from stable socioeconomic backgrounds, which limits generalizability to other cultural and social groups. Individual differences such as alexithymia (difficulty identifying and describing emotions), which co-occurs in 50% of autistic people, were not measured or controlled for. The CogEmp and AffEmp tasks used only six emotion options, which may have allowed for guessing or social desirability bias.

Declared interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest. The study received no financial support.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that autistic people are less empathic or that their emotions are 'harder to read' because they are expressive. The study shows a mismatch in interpretation styles. Furthermore, do not assume that having high autistic traits (High-AQ) in a clinician improves their ability to understand autistic patients, as the High-AQ group actually showed lower empathy scores overall.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →