SLPOtherJournal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation2024

Do the Nonlinear Dynamic Acoustic Measurements, Nonlinear Energy Difference Ratio and Spectrum Convergence Ratio, Correlate with Perceptual Evaluation of Esophageal Voice Speakers?

Fan Zhang, Duy Duong Nguyen, Catherine Madill and 8 others

PMID 35817624

WHAT IT FOUND

Nonlinear acoustic measures did not match expert ratings of esophageal voice quality, expert and non-expert intelligibility ratings, or transcription accuracy after total laryngectomy.

Key findings

01Expert dysphonia ratings for vowels averaged 4.72 on a 7-point scale, but the nonlinear measures did not significantly correlate with these ratings.

02Expert intelligibility ratings for connected speech averaged 4.57 on a 7-point scale, but the nonlinear measures did not significantly correlate with these ratings.

03Expert transcription accuracy averaged 95.8% for number counting and 69.00% for short phrases, but the nonlinear measures did not significantly correlate with these accuracy scores.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study included only esophageal voices, so the ratings were tightly clustered and may not reveal relationships that could appear with a broader range of voice types. The third non-expert rater was excluded because of low intra-rater reliability, so non-expert ratings were based on two raters. The microphone had a presence peak between 3-10-kHz, which may have biased the voice samples. Connected speech segmentation was done by listening and marking vocalization, which is more subjective than a moving-window method. Participants were required to be at least three months after completed radiation therapy and free of complications, so results may not apply to all esophageal speakers.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that acoustic assessment of esophageal voice has failed. This study only tested NEDR and SCR in a narrow sample of esophageal voices and found no significant correlations with perceptual ratings.

Read it on PubMed →