Disparities in Access to Highly Rated Skilled Nursing Facilities among Medicare Beneficiaries with Opioid Use Disorder.
Patience Moyo, Erum Choudry, Miriam George and 3 others
PMID 39117298WHAT IT FOUND
Medicare beneficiaries with opioid use disorder were admitted to skilled nursing facilities with lower overall star ratings than matched beneficiaries without opioid use disorder.
This disparity was driven by poorer staffing and health inspection scores. Quality ratings showed no significant difference.
Key findings
01Beneficiaries with OUD were less likely to be admitted to higher-rated SNFs for overall, staffing, and health inspection measures, but not for quality measures.
02The mean overall star rating was 3.40 for SNFs admitting beneficiaries with OUD compared to 3.46 for those without OUD.
03Differences in access to highly rated SNFs widened as county-level OUD prevalence increased.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study only captured patients who successfully entered an SNF. It lacked data on referral rejections, which are known to be higher for patients with OUD, meaning the results likely underestimate the true disparity in access. OUD status was determined from hospital claims data, so patients whose OUD was not documented or was not a primary reason for admission were excluded. The findings apply only to fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries and may not generalize to those in Medicare Advantage plans. The differences in star ratings were small in magnitude, and the authors note that the clinical significance of these disparities is difficult to ascertain.
Declared interests
The authors declared no conflicts of interest. The study was supported by the National Institutes of Health.
The easy way to misread this
Do not interpret the small difference in mean star ratings (3.40 vs 3.46) as evidence that patients with OUD receive significantly worse clinical care within these facilities. The study measures access to highly-rated buildings, not patient outcomes or care quality delivered, and the authors explicitly state the clinical significance is difficult to ascertain.