Discovery Research on the Success Factors for Schools-Based Multiple Model Speech and Language Placements: A Rapid Scoping Review.
Despina Laparidou, Sophie Willis, Louise Howe and 1 others
PMID 42720236WHAT IT FOUND
School-based speech and language therapy placements were described as supporting student learning and school service delivery, but funding, rural logistics, supervisor time, student readiness, and community trust were recurring barriers.
Key findings
01Fourteen studies were included, mostly from Australia and rural settings.
02The most common supervision model, used by 50% of studies, placed four occupational therapy and six speech and language therapy students across four school terms.
03Reported barriers included funding, travel and accommodation, student readiness, virtual supervision, and community trust.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
This was a rapid scoping review, so a single reviewer screened titles, abstracts, and full texts, which may have introduced selection bias. No formal critical appraisal was done, so the review maps the range of models rather than judging study quality or effectiveness. Only English-language sources were included, so relevant work in other languages may be missing. The included studies were mostly from Australia and rural areas, so they may not transfer to urban settings or other health systems. Many studies did not report supervision frequency, format, or student-to-supervisor ratios. Models are therefore hard to compare or reproduce. The review included opinion papers and did not determine intervention effectiveness, so reported improvements cannot be separated from the other supports in each model.
Declared interests
NHS England commissioned the review, but the authors state it was conducted independently and was not verified by NHS England. The authors declare no competing interests.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that school-based speech and language therapy placements are proven to reduce waiting lists or improve children's communication. The review did not appraise effectiveness, and it included opinion papers as well as empirical studies.