OTSurveyDisability and health journal2017

Disability stage and receipt of recommended care among elderly medicare beneficiaries.

Ling Na, Sean Hennessy, Hillary R Bogner and 6 others

PMID 27765676

WHAT IT FOUND

Older Medicare beneficiaries with the most severe activity limitations received recommended care much less often, especially after hospitalization: 43% versus 76% for those with no limitations.

Therapists should ask whether severely limited patients missed follow-up and preventive care.

Key findings

01Receipt of recommended care declined as ADL limitation stage rose, from 74.1% among those with no limitation to 62.3% among those at stage IV.

02Among ADL stage IV beneficiaries eligible for follow-up care after hospitalization, 43% received recommended care compared with 76% among those with no ADL limitation.

03Receipt of diagnosis-related care was around 50-60% across stages, and the study found no evidence of disparities by activity limitation stage for this type of care.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

This was an observational survey-claims study, so it cannot show that disability stage caused lower receipt of recommended care. The activity limitation stages were based on self- or proxy-reported difficulty with activities, which can introduce reporting bias. The analysis excluded beneficiaries enrolled in HMO plans, so it mainly describes fee-for-service Medicare and may miss differences in preventive care. The care indicators were first published in 2000, and the data were from 2001 to 2008 with follow-up to 2010, so they may not match current guidelines. The indicator system did not cover some conditions, such as dementia, and it did not provide guidance for patients with multiple co-existing conditions. About 18% of beneficiaries contacted for the survey did not consent to the initial interview, which may reduce generalizability, although the study used survey weights. The study did not examine temporal trends, so its percentages reflect an average over the period rather than changes over time.

Declared interests

The research was supported by a National Institutes of Health grant, R01HD074756. The authors reported no personal conflicts of interest and no disclosures beyond this funding source. They also stated that no party with a direct interest in the results would confer a benefit.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that disability stage caused missed care or that these patients received low-quality medical care. This was an observational survey-claims study, and the paper says differential receipt is suggestive of but distinct from low quality medical care.

Read it on PubMed →