PTOtherJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2019

Design, development, and evaluation of a local sensor-based gait phase recognition system using a logistic model decision tree for orthosis-control.

Johnny D Farah, Natalie Baddour, Edward D Lemaire

PMID 30709363

WHAT IT FOUND

A thigh and knee signal algorithm identified stance and swing phases in able-bodied walkers across slopes and speeds.

A correction step improved correct phase identification on unseen data, but no patient outcomes were tested.

Key findings

01The classifier distinguished loading response, push-off, swing, and terminal swing across surface conditions and walking speeds.

02On the training set, overall correct phase identification was 98.38%; on the validation set, it was 90.60% without correction and 98.61% with correction.

03The model was trained on 30 able-bodied participants and validated on 12 different able-bodied participants.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

All participants were able-bodied, so the study did not show how the system performs in people with knee-extensor weakness, the group stance-control knee orthoses are meant to help. The data came from a motion-capture laboratory system, not from the actual sensors that would be used in an orthosis. The authors noted that real sensor data may be noisier and lower quality, so the classification results may not transfer directly. The paper reports classification performance, not patient walking outcomes, falls, knee stability, or actual orthosis control. Misclassifications occurred at phase transitions, especially around push-off and loading response in validation without correction. Very slow walking was difficult because signal variation was small.

Declared interests

The study was funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. No other conflicts of interest are reported in the supplied text.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that this system is ready for patients or improves mobility. It was tested only on able-bodied motion-capture data, not in actual orthoses or people with knee weakness.

Read it on PubMed →