RNQualitativeMidwifery2020

Cultural beliefs and health-seeking practices: Rural Zambians' views on maternal-newborn care.

Julie M Buser, Cheryl A Moyer, Carol J Boyd and 5 others

PMID 32172077

WHAT IT FOUND

Rural Zambian mothers described hiding traditional newborn practices, such as herbs and fire rituals, while attending clinics.

Health workers said poor privacy and fear of HIV testing deterred care. Most groups knew danger signs, breastfeeding and immunization.

Key findings

01Mothers reported hiding traditional newborn practices while using facility care.

02Health workers said lack of clinic privacy and fear of partner HIV or STI testing deterred antenatal care.

03Most participants across groups identified essential newborn care practices, including breastfeeding, newborn danger signs and immunization.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study used a purposive sample from two rural districts, so the themes cannot be generalized to all Zambians or to other settings. Participants were recruited through rural primary care health centers, so the study does not capture the views of people who did not access those facilities. Focus groups may have made it harder for mothers to disclose sensitive traditional practices or conflicts with health workers. Translation between Bemba, Tumbuka and English may have lost subtleties, although 20% of transcripts were back translated. The paper reports different participant group counts in the text, which makes the exact composition of the sample less clear. No newborn outcomes or intervention effects were measured, because this was a qualitative study.

Declared interests

Funding came from University of Michigan units, Merck for Mothers, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and The ELMA Foundation. The paper states the funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or manuscript preparation. The authors declared no competing interests.

The easy way to misread this

Do not treat these themes as evidence that any practice is safe, harmful, or changed by counselling. The study reports patient and community beliefs, not tested interventions.

Read it on PubMed →