Creation and Initial Validation of the International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative Functional Diet Scale.
Catriona M Steele, Ashwini M Namasivayam-MacDonald, Brittany T Guida and 5 others
PMID 29428348WHAT IT FOUND
Clinicians in 29 countries mostly agreed with the reference panel on IDDSI Functional Diet Scale scores for 16 case scenarios.
The scale also lined up with the Functional Oral Intake Scale.
Key findings
01Across 170 responses from 29 countries, respondents agreed with the author panel reference scores in 73% of the IDDSI Functional Diet Scale decisions.
02Successive batches of 43 respondents scored the cases consistently.
03IDDSI Functional Diet Scale scores corresponded strongly with Functional Oral Intake Scale scores for the case scenarios.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The survey invited clinicians through social media and websites, so the respondents were self-selected. The number of people who saw or could have completed the survey is unknown. The study could not tell whether respondents scored the cases on their own or with colleagues. Most respondents were speech-language pathologists, so the results may not represent other professions involved in dysphagia care. Professional subgroups were too small to compare directly. The case scenarios were weighted toward nonoral diets or transition from nonoral feeding, and these cases produced the greatest disagreement. The study tested scoring of written cases, not real patient outcomes or dysphagia severity.
Declared interests
The paper is listed as supported by extramural National Institutes of Health research funding. The supplied text does not include an author conflict-of-interest declaration.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read this as evidence that the IDDSI Functional Diet Scale improves patient care or measures dysphagia severity. It was validated against written case scenarios and the Functional Oral Intake Scale, not against patient outcomes. The sample was self-selected and mostly speech-language pathologists.