SLPOtherTrends in hearing2018

Cortical Speech Processing in Postlingually Deaf Adult Cochlear Implant Users, as Revealed by Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy.

Xin Zhou, Abd-Krim Seghouane, Adnan Shah and 4 others

PMID 30022732

WHAT IT FOUND

In experienced cochlear implant users, stronger brain activation to speech in left temporal areas was linked to poorer speech understanding.

This is an association from a small study, not a clinical test or proof of cause.

Key findings

01Experienced cochlear implant users with poorer speech understanding showed stronger brain activation to visual speech in the left superior temporal sulcus or gyrus, while the right side did not reach significance after correction.

02In regions where implant users had higher activation than normal-hearing listeners during auditory speech, higher activation was significantly associated with poorer speech understanding in some left and right temporal regions.

03A combination of activation to auditory speech in a left region and activation to visual speech in a left region best predicted speech scores, and age, implant duration and speechreading did not add significant prediction.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Only 15 implant users and 14 normal-hearing listeners had usable data, so the sample is small and the correlations may not be stable. Four implant users and five normal-hearing listeners were excluded because hair prevented good optode contact, and one implant user withdrew, which may have changed the group that was analysed. The implant group was older than the normal-hearing group, and the authors considered this age difference when selecting regions of interest. fNIRS channels over the implant coil could not be measured, and the exact brain location of each channel is uncertain. The study compared existing implant users with normal-hearing listeners at one time point, so it shows associations, not causes or treatment effects. Many brain regions were tested, and some results did not survive correction for multiple comparisons. All analysed implant users had a right-ear implant and at least 12 months of experience, so findings may not apply to left-ear implants or newly implanted users.

Declared interests

Funding is listed as veski, a University PhD scholarship, the Australian Fulbright Commission, and an Australian Research Council Grant. The supplied text does not report commercial funding or additional author conflicts.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that fNIRS brain activation can be used to assess cochlear implant candidates or that these patterns cause poor speech understanding. The study analysed existing groups and found correlations, not treatment effects.

Read it on PubMed →