SLPSystematic ReviewThe South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings2021

Contextualising clinical reasoning within the clinical swallow evaluation: A scoping review and expert consultation.

Thiani Pillay, Mershen Pillay

PMID 34342487

WHAT IT FOUND

Clinical reasoning in swallow assessments is driven more by experience than training.

Experts argue that rigid protocols fail in low-resource settings, requiring flexible, context-aware decision-making to adapt to patient needs and limited equipment.

Key findings

01Experience and intuition, rather than formal training, are the primary guides for clinical reasoning in dysphagia assessments.

02Clinical decisions are heavily influenced by the setting, with community-based therapists relying more on bedside assessments due to lack of access to instrumental tools.

03Effective practice in low-resource contexts requires flexible, non-linear reasoning that adapts standard protocols to local constraints and patient needs.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The included studies were all from high-income countries, which may limit the generalizability of the literature findings to low-resource contexts, despite the expert consultation. The search was restricted to the last 49 years and focused specifically on the Clinical Swallow Evaluation, excluding studies on instrumental assessments or broader dysphagia management. The expert consultation was limited to South Africa, using it as a proxy for low-middle income contexts, which may not capture the full diversity of global resource constraints.

Declared interests

The authors declared no conflicts of interest. The study was approved by the Biomedical Research Ethics Committee of the University of KwaZulu-Natal.

The easy way to misread this

Do not interpret the preference for experience as a dismissal of evidence-based practice. The review suggests that experience informs how evidence is applied in complex, real-world contexts, not that it replaces the need for clinical knowledge.

Read it on PubMed →