Construct Validity of the Brazilian Portuguese Version of the Thyroidectomy-Related Voice and Symptom Questionnaire (BR-PT-TVSQ).
Ana Flávia de Sales Cândido, Jozemar Pereira Dos Santos, Anna Alice Almeida and 2 others
PMID 41492039WHAT IT FOUND
The Brazilian Portuguese thyroidectomy symptom questionnaire grouped patient-reported problems into voice, throat and neck/chest domains.
Voice symptoms formed the largest group, but throat and neck/chest items overlapped.
Key findings
01The questionnaire produced three domains: voice symptoms, throat symptoms, and neck/chest discomfort symptoms.
02The three-domain model fit the data better than the original two-domain structure.
03The throat symptom domain and the neck/chest discomfort domain did not clearly separate from each other.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The sample was mostly female and mostly from the Southeast region, so it may not represent men or all regions. Data came from hospital records, telephone calls and an online form, so responses may not have been collected in the same way for everyone. The study did not follow people over time, so it cannot show how scores change after treatment or surgery. Other measurement properties, such as test-retest reliability, responsiveness and measurement invariance, were not tested. The final model required outlier removal and still failed an overall fit test. The throat and neck/chest domains did not separate clearly, so sub-scores for those domains are less secure.
Declared interests
CAPES in Brazil funded part of the work. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read the new domain structure as proof that the questionnaire is fully validated or that throat and neck/chest sub-scores are separate. The throat and neck/chest domains did not separate clearly, and responsiveness, test-retest reliability and measurement invariance were not tested.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →