PTOTSLPQualitativeFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2025

Competency requirements for patients and therapists in telerehabilitation aftercare: a qualitative study.

Anna Lea Stark-Blomeier, Stephan Krayter, Christoph Dockweiler

PMID 41211477

WHAT IT FOUND

Therapists and patients described telerehabilitation competencies as mostly social and professional, not just technical.

They stressed that prior in-person therapy experience and structured onboarding are essential. Current training was reported as inconsistent and often insufficient.

Key findings

01Participants identified social-emotional skills, such as communication and empathy, as critical for both patients and therapists, alongside basic technical skills.

02Therapists stated that prior professional experience in on-site, in-person therapy is necessary to effectively deliver telerehabilitation and recognize health risks.

03Onboarding and training processes for telerehabilitation were described as lacking standardization and institutionalization, leading to insufficient preparation for users.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTsWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The sample was very small, particularly the patient group (n=5), limiting the depth of patient perspectives. Participants were mostly highly educated and technology-affine, so findings may not apply to patients with lower digital literacy or education. The study was conducted in Germany, where telerehabilitation aftercare is part of standard care, so findings may not generalize to other healthcare systems. Patient interviews were not conducted as focus groups due to low recruitment, which may have limited the interaction and depth of data compared to therapist interviews. Selection bias is likely, as participants volunteered and were recruited through digital channels, potentially excluding those who struggled with or avoided telerehabilitation.

Declared interests

The study was funded by the Society for Rehabilitation Sciences North Rhine-Westphalia. Open access fees were covered by the University Library of Siegen. No other conflicts of interest were declared.

The easy way to misread this

Do not interpret these findings as evidence that telerehabilitation improves patient outcomes. This study only describes the competencies users feel are necessary; it does not test whether possessing these competencies actually leads to better health results.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →