RNSystematic ReviewJournal of midwifery & women's health2026

Community-Based Initiatives to Improve Maternal and Newborn Health in High-Income Settings: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.

Elise Robinson, Aradhna Kaushal, Joanna Drazdzewska

PMID 41022619

WHAT IT FOUND

Peer support in high-income countries consistently improves maternal mental health and breastfeeding rates, with 9 of 10 studies showing benefit.

Social support alone is often ineffective, but gains value when combined with health education. Women valued connectedness and practical information.

Key findings

01Peer support interventions improved maternal and newborn health outcomes in 9 of 10 studies, specifically reducing perinatal mental health symptoms and increasing breastfeeding initiation and duration.

02Social support interventions alone showed varying or null impacts on depression scores, but interventions combining social support with health education consistently reported benefits for maternal mental health.

03Qualitative data revealed that women valued peer support for creating connectedness, providing emotional validation, and offering practical information from peers they viewed as experts.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The review excluded studies where interventions were delivered by healthcare professionals (like midwives or maternity support workers), limiting the findings to strictly community-led or peer-delivered initiatives. High dropout rates and loss-to-follow-up were noted in several included RCTs, which may affect the validity of the positive findings. There was significant heterogeneity in intervention design (timing, duration, setting), making direct comparisons difficult. No studies directly evaluated Participatory Learning and Action (PLA) methodology in high-income settings, so the review could not confirm if this specific model is effective in these countries.

Declared interests

The authors declared no conflicts of interest. The review was conducted in collaboration with Women and Children First, a UK-based charity, which engaged in the screening process and helped define the research topic.

The easy way to misread this

Do not assume all 'social support' is effective for preventing postpartum depression. The review found that social support interventions alone often showed no significant benefit, whereas those combined with health education or peer support structures were successful. Implementing a generic support group without an educational or peer-matching component may not improve mental health outcomes.

Read it on PubMed →