PTRCTEuropean journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine2025

Combining low-frequency magnetic stimulation with motor imagery to improve lower limb recovery and motor pathway integrity in cerebral infarction: a randomized, double-blind, and controlled study.

Jiasheng Wang, Yang Ye, Xuehan Zang and 8 others

PMID 41159516

WHAT IT FOUND

After three weeks, adding low-frequency magnetic stimulation and motor imagery to usual rehabilitation improved lower limb motor scores more than motor imagery alone, but not more than magnetic stimulation alone.

Key findings

01After three weeks, FMA-LE, FAC and TUGT values changed in all three groups.

02On the primary FMA-LE score, the combined group was better than the MI group and not significantly different from the rTMS group.

03The combined group showed greater FA improvement than single treatments in the corona radiata and posterior limb of the internal capsule, and greater rFA improvement in the corona radiata and infarcted foci.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

There was no sham or untreated control group, so some improvement may have come from usual rehabilitation or spontaneous recovery. All groups received conventional physical rehabilitation plus speech, cognitive and swallowing therapy, so the contribution of any single component cannot be separated. The study had no long-term follow-up, so it cannot show whether gains persisted. The sample was small and some comparisons were only trends, including FMA-LE and TUGT versus rTMS. Patients were in the subacute phase, with disease duration about 60 days (range 30 to 89 days), so results may not apply to acute or chronic stroke. The TMS target was positioned without MRI-guided neuronavigation. Upper limb motor function was not measured, so effects on both limbs were not assessed. The authors reported no significant correlations between brain structural changes and clinical effects.

Declared interests

The authors declared no financial conflicts of interest. Funding was from the Science and Technology Program of Jinhua, Zhejiang Province, grant 2021-4-048.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that magnetic stimulation plus motor imagery is necessary. Every group also received conventional physical rehabilitation plus speech, cognitive and swallowing therapy, and there was no sham or untreated control, so the contribution of any single component cannot be separated. The combined group was also not significantly better than magnetic stimulation alone on the primary lower limb motor score.

Read it on PubMed →