Combining goal setting and achievement with occupational therapy to improve pain, psychological factors and physical activity in patients after high tibial osteotomy: A non-randomized controlled study.
Yuki Hiraga, Shinya Hisano, Ryusei Hara and 3 others
PMID 34408556WHAT IT FOUND
OT goal setting did not lower walking pain more than usual rehab, but was associated with better depression, more daily steps and more activity time by five weeks.
Key findings
01Walking pain did not differ between groups on the 0-to-10 pain scale; the reported difference was 0.01 points.
02Depression scores were better in the OT group than control after intervention: 4.4 ± 2.5 versus 8.2 ± 2.9 on the 14-question HADS.
03The OT group had more daily steps and more physical activity time than control: 3708.4 ± 1552.5 versus 1889.0 ± 633.0 steps and 998.5 ± 212.1 versus 764.8 ± 199.9 min.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Patients were allocated by treatment period rather than random assignment, so unmeasured differences between groups may explain the results. The paper reports different group sizes in the methods and results sections, so the analysed sample is unclear. The study analysed only 14 intervention and 17 control patients, so findings are uncertain. The results text reports physical activity time in minutes, while the table labels the same values as seconds. Follow-up was only until hospital discharge at about five weeks, so long-term effects are unknown. All patients also received surgery, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and physical therapy, and the intervention group received occupational therapy, so the contribution of any single component cannot be separated. The paper does not state a single primary outcome, and several outcomes were analysed. Patients with dementia, obvious mental illness, refusal of occupational therapy, postoperative complications, significant medical conditions, prior high tibial osteotomy or non-degenerative causes were excluded, so results may not apply to those groups. The control group did not receive occupational therapy, so the intervention group had additional therapist contact, which may have influenced outcomes.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that goal setting alone caused the improvements. Walking pain did not differ between groups. All patients also received surgery, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and physical therapy, and the intervention group received occupational therapy, so the contribution of any single component cannot be separated.